Speaker summary
⁠92%2 analyzed articles/videos40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Zwonitzer results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Primacy Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,373 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Zwonitzer is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Mark Zwonitzer
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos