Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Stetson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 252 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,656 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Stetson is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Mark Stetson
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%No True Scotsman: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos