Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Stetson results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 2,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (935 of 6,628 authors). This Mark Stetson is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Mark Stetson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠86%Mark Stetson (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 29.1%29.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 15.1%15.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 18.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 15.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos