Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Rosen results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 41% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 256.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,080 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Rosen is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Mark Rosen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 150
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
29.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos150 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 51.5%51.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 41.0%41.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ad Hominem: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 41.0%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos