Speaker summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos246.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Paoletta results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 61.9% saturation with 236 hits. Analysis detected 1,002.429 faulty-reasoning hits from 246.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,142 of 28,035 speakers). This Mark Paoletta is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group.
Mark Paoletta
Speaker details
Total words: 246.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510031.7% percentile
19.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos246.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 61.9%61.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.9%21.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.2%25.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 61.9%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos