Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video464.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Heck results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 96.32 hits. Analysis detected 772.824 faulty-reasoning hits from 464.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,916 of 28,200 speakers). This Mark Heck is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group.
Mark Heck
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 464.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.6% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos464.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.7%6.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos