Author summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,315 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miranda Dunlap results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 724 hits . Analysis detected 7,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,945 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (4,917 of 6,258 authors). This Miranda Dunlap is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Miranda Dunlap
Author details
Total words: 9,945
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst