Author summary
13% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Yahr results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Pessimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 4,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,673 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,377 of 6,359 authors). This Natalie Yahr is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Natalie Yahr
Author details
Total words: 5,673
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst