Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark DeSaulnier results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 89.6% saturation with 63.171 hits. Analysis detected 502.531 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,409 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark DeSaulnier is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Mark DeSaulnier
Speaker details
Total words: 70.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.3% percentile
47.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 89.6%89.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 69.8%69.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 59.4%59.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 55.5%55.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 52.5%52.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.4%60.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 43.5%43.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 39.6%39.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 89.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 69.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 59.4%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 55.5%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 43.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos