Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Chen results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 195 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,745 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Chen is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group.
Mark Chen
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510076.2% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos