Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Amodei, R-Nev. results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Biased Writer Voice, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,413 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Amodei, R-Nev. is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Mark Amodei, R-Nev.
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
57.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 55.3%55.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 55.3%55.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 44.7%44.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.7%44.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 55.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos