Speaker summary
84%1 analyzed article/video102.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Abrials results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 74% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 703.833 faulty-reasoning hits from 102.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (12,179 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Abrials is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Mark Abrials
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 102.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
38.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos102.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 61.7%61.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 74.0%74.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 55.5%55.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 74.0%74.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 37.0%37.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 37.0%37.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 74.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 74.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 61.7%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 55.5%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 0.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos