Speaker summary
55%4 analyzed articles/videos88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (18,564 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Mark
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.6% percentile
21.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.7%8.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 3.3%Tu Quoque: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate