Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Helen Zhao results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 324 hits . Analysis detected 2,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Helen Zhao is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Helen Zhao
Author details
Total words: 2,432
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 13.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst