Speaker summary
⁠75%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marisol Samayoa results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Self-Serving Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 444.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,951 of 28,364 speakers). This Marisol Samayoa is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Marisol Samayoa
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
44.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.8%50.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 49.3%49.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 25.4%25.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 49.3%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos