Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mario Díaz-Balart results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (12,166 of 38,731 speakers). This Mario Díaz-Balart is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Mario Díaz-Balart
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠69%Mario Díaz-Balart (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.6% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos