Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video2,667.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marie Harf results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 464.507 hits. Analysis detected 3,677.989 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,667.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (27,907 of 28,364 speakers). This Marie Harf is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Marie Harf
Speaker details
Total words: 2,667.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.6% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos