Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Su results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 81.7% saturation with 150.75 hits. Analysis detected 210.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,666 of 28,364 speakers). This Maria Su is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Maria Su
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
21.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos164 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 81.7%81.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Optimism Bias: Speaker 81.7%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos