Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video32.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Pappas results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 57 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (8,178 of 43,844 speakers). This Maria Pappas is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
Maria Pappas
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠82%Maria Pappas (selected)74%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
73.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos32.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 46.1%46.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 46.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos