Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Godoy results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (11,542 of 25,889 speakers). This Maria Godoy is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Maria Godoy
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
37.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.8%31.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos