Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Elvira Salazar's office results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (2,637 of 28,364 speakers). This Maria Elvira Salazar's office is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Maria Elvira Salazar's office
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos