Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marcus Dorstel results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 99 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,353 of 28,364 speakers). This Marcus Dorstel is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Marcus Dorstel
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510067.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos