Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 1,079 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elisabeth Rosenthal results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 319 hits . Analysis detected 2,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,333 of 6,628 authors). This Elisabeth Rosenthal is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Elisabeth Rosenthal
Author details
Total words: 4,316
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst