Speaker summary
⁠69%2 analyzed articles/videos151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Whyte results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, False Dilemma, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 66 hits. Analysis detected 262.756 faulty-reasoning hits from 151 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,796 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Whyte is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Marc Whyte
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 151
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
21.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos151 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%False Dilemma: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 7.5%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos