Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Weinberg results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 781 faulty-reasoning hits from 510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,010 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Weinberg is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Marc Weinberg
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠12%Marc Weinberg (selected)11%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 510
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
10.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos510 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 47.6%47.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.7%14.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 47.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos