Speaker summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video82.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Schreiber results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.6% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 269.047 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,050 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Schreiber is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Marc Schreiber
Speaker details
Total words: 82.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
22.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.6%55.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 29.6%29.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.6%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 6.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos