STLPR0%

St. Louis wins bid to host U.S. Olympic marathon trials in 2028 9%

By Chad Davis0%

6/4/2026, 7:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Quote-first Misdirection, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 506 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,023 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the article peer group.

The race to the 2028 Summer Olympics begins in St. 
Louis: The city will host the Olympic marathon trials. 
The 2028 U.S. 
Olympic Team Trials–Marathon will take place on March 25, 2028. 
The top three men and three women finalists will represent Team USA months later at the 2028 Summer Olympic Games in Los Angeles. 
St. 
Louis Mayor Cara Spencer, sports commission leaders, Washington University officials and USA Track & Field and the U.S. 
Olympic and Paralympic Committee leaders made the announcement Thursday afternoon at WashU near the Francis Olympic Field. 
East St. 
Louis gold medalists Dawn Harper-Nelson and Jackie Joyner-Kersee also took part in the announcement. 
“[Athletes] are going to come from all over the nation to see what St. 
Louis has to offer,” said Joyner-Kersee, who is also the St. 
Louis Organizing Committee co-chair. 
More than 100,000 people are expected to attend the marathon, which will be televised by NBC. 
The trials will coincide with the Greater St. 
Louis Marathon, which will take place the next day. 
Go! 
St. 
Louis President Mona Vespa said the race will be a celebration of the Olympics, St. 
Louis and the local running community. 
USATF CEO Max Siegel thanked the region’s organizing community for its work to secure the bid. 
“Nothing highlights a city like a marathon,” Siegel said. 
“When we come back here again in two years, it will be for a day that changes lives.” 
On the course, athletes will run by St. 
Louis landmarks, including the Gateway Arch, Forest Park, Busch Stadium and WashU, the site of the first summer Olympics and thus the first summer Olympic marathon in the United States. 
The trials will conclude in St. 
Louis City SC’s Energizer Park. 
The announcement doesn't come entirely as a surprise. 
St. 
Louis leaders revealed in February that Energizer Park would be one of the venues hosting Olympic soccer matches in 2028. 
Regional officials said at that time that the city was a finalist for the trials. 
The last time the city hosted Olympic marathon trials was 100 years later. 
The Olympic Team Trials Women’s Marathon began at WashU and ended at the World's Fair Pavilion in Forest Park. 
Athletes Colleen De Reuck, Deena Kastor and Jen Rhines qualified for the 2004 Summer Olympic Games in Athens. 
Kastor won a bronze medal later that summer. 
Other St. 
Louis-area track and field Olympians include Brandon Miller and gold medalist Ray Armstead. 
The St. 
Louis Sports Commission President Marc Schreiber thanked the regional partners who helped secure the trials.<b> </b>He said 2028 is looking to be a massive Olympic year in St. 
Louis, with the marathon trials, soccer and potentially the Olympic torch relay, though he said it’s not a done deal yet. 
“How many cities would yearn for that kind of Olympic activity and wish to be so closely connected to the LA Games,” Schreiber asked. 
“St. 
Louisans should feel darn good about that.” 
This story has been updated with details of the announcement. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 8.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.1%Chad Davis: 4.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias12.1%This article: 4.2%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 9.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Chad Davis: 2.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.7%Chad Davis: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon4.7%This article: 11.7%Chad Davis: 9.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion11.7%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.0%Chad Davis: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.3%Chad Davis: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.3%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 4.9%Chad Davis: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.9%This article: 1.8%Chad Davis: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 1.4%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination1.4%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chad Davis: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

506 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers34%attributed speech332writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJackie Joyner-Kersee • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJackie Joyner-Kersee • 11 words • 100.0% coverageSt. Louis Organizing Committee • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMona Vespa • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMona Vespa • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMax Siegel • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMax Siegel • 9 words • 100.0% coverageMax Siegel • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Schreiber • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Schreiber • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Schreiber • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Schreiber • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMarc Schreiber • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marc Schreiber

99%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words47% of attributed speech14% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination+8.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marc Schreiber: 8.6%8.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.