Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video133.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Kosak results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 171.234 faulty-reasoning hits from 133.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,294 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Kosak is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Marc Kosak
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 133.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
34.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos133.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.1%34.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos