Speaker summary
â 79% 1 analyzed article/video 93 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Jason results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Bandwagon , and Recency Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 50 hits . Analysis detected 165.571 faulty-reasoning hits from 93 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of â 25% (21,344 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Jason is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Marc Jason
Speaker details
Total words: 93
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 16.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos93 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 39.3% 39.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 35.0% 35.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% False Dilemma: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 15.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 7.5% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst