Author summary
â 8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natanya Friedheim results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Appeal to Authority , and Bandwagon , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 145 hits . Analysis detected 1,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,185 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of â 2% (6,140 of 6,244 authors). This Natanya Friedheim is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Natanya Friedheim
Author details
Total words: 4,185
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst