Speaker summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 1,618.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mara Karlin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 288.375 hits . Analysis detected 2,295.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,618.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,995 of 28,364 speakers). This Mara Karlin is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Mara Karlin
Speaker details
Total words: 1,618.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 15.8% 15.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst