Speaker summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos5,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan Institute results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 315 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,533 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (28,353 of 28,364 speakers). This Manhattan Institute is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Manhattan Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 5,533
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
1.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos