Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Malek Lazri results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 1,079.526 faulty-reasoning hits from 586 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,691 of 28,364 speakers). This Malek Lazri is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Malek Lazri
Speaker details
Total words: 586
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos586 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos