Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video131.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Makeda Peterson results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 40.5% saturation with 62.73 hits. Analysis detected 389.73 faulty-reasoning hits from 131.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (16,909 of 25,883 speakers). This Makeda Peterson is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Makeda Peterson
Speaker details
Total words: 131.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.7% percentile
21.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos131.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 53.6%53.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 40.5%40.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 53.6%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.8%No True Scotsman: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos