Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos242.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Majed Al Ansari results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 62.3% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 249 faulty-reasoning hits from 242.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (12,003 of 25,889 speakers). This Majed Al Ansari is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Majed Al Ansari

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
35.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos242.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 62.3%62.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos