Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video206.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Magnet Forensics results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 33% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 325 faulty-reasoning hits from 206.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,564 of 28,364 speakers). This Magnet Forensics is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Magnet Forensics
Speaker details
Total words: 206.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos206.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.2%30.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Begging the Question: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos