Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video162.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Nurrenbern results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 41.029 hits. Analysis detected 475.092 faulty-reasoning hits from 162.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (19,407 of 26,519 speakers). This Maggie Nurrenbern is better (less manipulative) than 73.20% of the peer group.
Maggie Nurrenbern
Speaker details
Total words: 162.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.8% percentile
17.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos162.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 24.9%24.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 26.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 24.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 8.1%Straw Man: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 3.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos