Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video209.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison Brouillette results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 197.436 faulty-reasoning hits from 209.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,621 of 28,364 speakers). This Madison Brouillette is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Madison Brouillette
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751006.1% percentile
7.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos209.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos