Speaker summary
49% 5 analyzed articles/videos 433.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 433.5 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,845 of 28,364 speakers). This Madison is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Madison
Speaker details
Total words: 433.5
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.4% percentile 6.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos433.5 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 25.4% 25.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst