Speaker summary
49%5 analyzed articles/videos433.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 433.5 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,845 of 28,364 speakers). This Madison is better (less manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group.
Madison
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 433.5
Content count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.4% percentile
6.9% BS Score5 analyzed videos433.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.4%11.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Straw Man: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate