Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Henwood results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Genetic Fallacy, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 546 hits. Analysis detected 3,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (437 of 6,372 authors). This Doug Henwood is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Doug Henwood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
94%Doug Henwood (selected)9%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
8.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 39.9%39.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 32.2%32.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.0%11.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Author 16.9%16.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.3%5.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 32.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 22.2%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 16.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.9%Straw Man: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos