Speaker summary
ā 50%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lynn Holly Fodor results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 76.3% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.2% and a BS Rank of ā 74% (7,394 of 28,364 speakers). This Lynn Holly Fodor is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Lynn Holly Fodor
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 74%Lynn Holly Fodor (selected)58%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.9% percentile
57.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 76.3%76.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.2%38.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 76.3%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos