Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video119.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lynn Adelman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 69.1% saturation with 101.201 hits. Analysis detected 201.201 faulty-reasoning hits from 119.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,006 of 28,364 speakers). This Lynn Adelman is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Lynn Adelman
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 119.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos119.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 69.1%69.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 69.1%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos