Speaker summary
ā 92%1 analyzed article/video11 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lyman results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 11 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 11 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 91% (2,580 of 28,364 speakers). This Lyman is worse (more manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Lyman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 91%Lyman (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 11
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

91% percentile
025507510090.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos11 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos