Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lupita Nyong’o results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.4% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,273 of 28,364 speakers). This Lupita Nyong’o is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Lupita Nyong’o
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
38.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.5%57.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 14.9%14.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 57.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos