Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos312.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Russert results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,865.379 faulty-reasoning hits from 312.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,268 of 28,364 speakers). This Luke Russert is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Luke Russert
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 312.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
11.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos312.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 36.9%36.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 32.0%32.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 29.9%29.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 36.9%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos