Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video128.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Rankin results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Bandwagon, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 42.084 hits. Analysis detected 256.395 faulty-reasoning hits from 128.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,662 of 28,364 speakers). This Luke Rankin is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Luke Rankin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 128.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
19.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos128.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 31.0%31.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.6%9.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ad Hominem: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Bandwagon: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos