Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Epps results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 188.881 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,854 of 28,364 speakers). This Luke Epps is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Luke Epps
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
20.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 29.8%29.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.9%28.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.6%10.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos