Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video53.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luis Lopez results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 84.8% saturation with 51.277 hits. Analysis detected 128.556 faulty-reasoning hits from 53.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,174 of 28,364 speakers). This Luis Lopez is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Luis Lopez
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 53.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
26.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos53.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 84.8%84.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%In-Group Bias: Speaker 84.8%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos