Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video114 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucinda Brouillette results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hindsight Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 59.2% saturation with 67.5 hits. Analysis detected 320.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 114 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,439 of 28,364 speakers). This Lucinda Brouillette is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Lucinda Brouillette
Speaker details
Total words: 114
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
34.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos114 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos