Speaker summary
ā 35%1 analyzed article/video281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucha Flan results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 47.5 hits. Analysis detected 194.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 281 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.5% and a BS Rank of ā 15% (22,948 of 26,891 speakers). This Lucha Flan is better (less manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Lucha Flan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 15%Lucha Flan (selected)12%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 281
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.7% percentile
11.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos281 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 16.9%16.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos